The problem with single-framework tools
HIPAA + NIST + SOC 2 teams duplicate evidence work because each tool treats controls as isolated checklists.
Compliance workflow
One control, many frameworks. One signoff, audit-ready.
Map one Microsoft 365 control to many frameworks, then capture per-control signoff with evidence provenance for audit-ready workflow.
Answer first
Short answer
The Compliance Crosswalk maps Microsoft 365 evidence across frameworks while Signoff captures approver, date, next review, and linked evidence for each control.
Who it helpsSecurity, compliance, MSP, and IT leaders.
What you getEvidence-backed Microsoft 365 posture answers.
Next stepBook a walkthrough.
What the crosswalk does
One MFA control can satisfy NIST 800-171 IA-2, ISO 27001 A.9.2.1, and CIS M365 1.1.2 simultaneously.
What signoff adds
Each control gets approver, signoff date, next review, and linked evidence artifact — screenshot, JSON export, or audit-log URL.
Worked example: one MFA control, many frameworks
| Evidence | NIST 800-171 | ISO 27001 | CIS M365 | Signoff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFA enforced for privileged roles | IA-2 | A.9.2.1 | 1.1.2 | Approver · date · next review |
12 frameworks supported
CIS M365, CIS Azure, CJIS, CMMC, FedRAMP, GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, NIST 800-207 Zero Trust, NIST CSF, PCI-DSS, and SOC 2 are represented in the evidence model where applicable.
What an assessor sees
A per-control evidence packet with source JSON, remediation status, owner, due date, signoff, and next review. Pair it with the Cross-Framework Crosswalk & Signoff Matrix report.